Thursday, June 6, 2013

People v King - Michigan Medical Marihuana Act - MMMA - Michigan Marihuana Lawyer - Josh Jones


What Is A Patient Under The MMMA

The Michigan Supreme Court in People v King determined what an individual must do in order to be considered a “patient” within the language of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA). See People v King. It explained that “patients” must obtain a doctor’s statement indicating a medical need for marijuana prior to the commission of any potential criminal act. A written statement or “prescription” may be more appropriate due to the required evidentiary hearing that is attached to criminal charges. It seem the outcome of the evidentiary hearing will be determined on the reasonableness of the activity compared to the requirements indicated in Section 8 of the MMMA. See MCLA § 333.16428.

Once the patient has obtained a statement or “prescription” from a doctor he or she may use a “reasonably necessary quantity of marijuana.” The Court did not elaborate on “reasonably necessary.” But in essence, a “patient” should be allowed to hold at least 2.5 ounces of marijuana (the amount indicated in Section 4). See MCLA § 333.26424.

It seems that the Court interpreted the Act clearly in a fashion that it was intended, which consisted of a variation in the term “patient.” You have those patients that will want to be somewhat immune from criminal exposure, if that person adheres to the strict requirements of Section 4 of the MMMA. See Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. Section 4. You will also have those patients that do not want to register or become “qualified patients.” In the end the MMMA allows for multiple defenses involving a “patient’s” antibiotics.  See Mich. Supreme Court Expands Mich. Medical Marihuana Act.  

Consult your attorney to discuss the potential exposure to criminal prosecution and the stages of prosecution in order to make an informed decision about any and all questions regarding the MMMA. 

DO NOT RELY ON THESE LEGAL OPINIONS AND OBSERVATIONS WHEN REPRESENTING YOURSELF IN COURT. THESE ARTICLES ARE NOT MEANT TO COMPENSATE OR EFFECUATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION. YOU SHOULD AND MUST CONTACT AN ATTORNEY AND DISCUSS WITH HIM OR HER THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY AND ALL IDEAS, STATEMENTS, OPINIONS, EXPRESSIONS OR OTHERWISE STATED ON THIS SITE. HOPE TO SPEAK WITH YOU SOON.

No comments:

Post a Comment